Legal Opinion

Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1962No. 8381PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SOBELOFF, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment holding the defendant in contempt for refusing to obey the District Judge’s order requiring the defendant, pursuant to Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., to produce written statements of witnesses obtained by its claim agent. The specific question presented is whether the District Judge has abused his discretion by finding that the plaintiff had satisfactorily shown such “good cause” as is required by Rule 34 before discovery of written statements of prospective witnesses may be ordered. Concededly, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  4. Richard Hauger v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. Reynolds v. United States. Brauner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Thomas Organ Co. v. Jadranska Slobodna PlovidbaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1972
  2. American Express Warehousing, Ltd. v. Transamerica Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
  4. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Rakes v. FulcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API