Melzer v. Peninsular Car Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Case for negligence. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, and points of counsel, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This action is brought to recover damages for *95an injury to plaintiff in trimming a grindstone for the defendant while he was in defendant’s employ.
The defendant is a corporation doing business in the city of Detroit.
The plaintiff entered into its employ in the spring of 1886, as a common laborer, wheeling out scrap-iron from the drills in the machine-shop, keeping them clean, etc., and in which employment he continued until September 12, 1887.
The plaintiff’s claim in his declaration is that on September 10,1887, the foreman of defendant ordered him to work upon a grindstone, to trinr the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kean v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by10 opinions
- Manning v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Braasch v. Michigan Stove Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Burk v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- Hathaway v. Washington Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Soderstrom v. Holland-Emery Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.