Legal Opinion

Hathaway v. Washington Milling Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1905No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Case by Richard Hathaway against the Washington Milling Company for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.

The defendant, for several years prior to September 5, 1898, operated a flouring mill in the *709city of Adrian. In the fall of 1892, plaintiff began to. work for defendant, being employed in the packing department of the mill, the operation of which department was in a building 12 or 14 feet from the mill proper, connected with it by a covered passageway. There was machinery in the packing department, which during the six years of his employment the plaintiff had been acquainted with, had oiled, kept in order, and generally superintended. At various times and frequently he had been called into…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harrison v. MetzMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. McKisson v. DavenportMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Schroeder v. Michigan Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ludwig v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Melzer v. Peninsular Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  2. In Re Debancourt's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Farris v. BeecherMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Neifert v. MetlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McBride v. Chippewa Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API