Legal Opinion

Kean v. Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1887PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error to superior court of Detroit. (Ohipman, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

The defendant in this case is a manufacturer of copper and brass materials, having its place of business in the city of Detroit, and in its works has a machine called'the “Breakdown Rolls,” the purpose of which is to reduce bars of the metal to thin plates. The rolls are about 10 inches in diameter and 40 inches long, and run together at a speed of about 13 revolutions a minute. When used they are placed from an eighth of an inch to an inch apart, according to the thickness of the plate desired to be made. Oil is used upon the rolls, and they have to be cleaned from one to three times a day.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hayden v. Smithville Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
  3. Davis v. Detroit & Milwaukee Rail RoadMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Sullivan v. Mississippi & Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  2. Swick v. Ætna Portland Cement Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Epperson v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. Showalter v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. ShalstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API