Legal Opinion

Manning v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Negligence case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinions.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

The declaration in this case alleges as grounds of negligence that the defendant did “wrongfully and negligently permit a certain tree to stand and remain by the side of and in close proximity to the said railroad, so that persons in the employ of said defendant, who were required to render labor and service of and pertaining to their employment in managing and making use of certain appliances, to wit, brakes, on certain of said cars, could not do and perform such labor and service without being exposed and subjected to danger of personal injury and of being killed by colliding with said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Colorado Midland R'y Co. v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Illick v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tyndale v. Old Colony RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  4. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Pennington v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1892

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Zoski v. GainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Howe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Williams v. WoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Powers v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API