Legal Opinion

People v. Trevor W.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 2001No. E027461PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Trevor W. appeals from a juvenile court disposition sustaining allegations of grand theft and placing him on probation on condition he serve 210 days in juvenile hall and make restitution to the victim. We conclude the court lacked authority to impose the juvenile hall time without adjudging Trevor to be a ward of the court. Otherwise, we affirm the disposition.

I

Factual and Procedural Background

Trevor became employed as a sales associate at an Izod clothing store in November 1998. The store sustained substantial losses between December 1998 and May 1999. Although figures for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. In Re Ricardo M.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. Kirkpatrick v. W. R. W.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. People v. GilchristCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Walter P.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. DERICK B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. In re A.B. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. In re E.C. CA1/1California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. In re S.T. CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API