People v. Gilchrist
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ABBE, J. *
This casepresents a problem of whether the law requires a retroactive application of the maximum period of probation under the determinate sentence law (DSL) to persons who were placed on probation prior to the effective date of that law. We conclude it does not.
Defendant was sentenced to state prison for offering to sell cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352) following an order revoking his probation. On appeal 1 defendant challenges the order revoking probation contending: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke probation as his probationary period should have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- People v. Superior Court (Gonzales)California Court of Appeal · 1978
- People v. AngusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. BritoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Khodayari v. MashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.