Legal Opinion

People v. Gilchrist

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1982No. Crim. 11642PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ABBE, J. *

This casepresents a problem of whether the law requires a retroactive application of the maximum period of probation under the determinate sentence law (DSL) to persons who were placed on probation prior to the effective date of that law. We conclude it does not.

Defendant was sentenced to state prison for offering to sell cocaine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11352) following an order revoking his probation. On appeal 1 defendant challenges the order revoking probation contending: (1) the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke probation as his probationary period should have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. EvansCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. Superior Court (Gonzales)California Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. People v. AngusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BritoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. People v. SpearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Khodayari v. MashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API