Legal Opinion

In Re Ricardo M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1975No. Crim. 27304PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

The petition for habeas corpus here before us raises the issue of the right of the juvenile court to impose as a condition of probation, granted after an adjudication of wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602, the requirement that the minor spend not less than 5 nor more than 20 days in juvenile hall as determined by the hall’s staff. The issue is one in which decisions of the Court of Appeal in In re Preston B., 273 Cal.App.2d 607 [78 Cal.Rptr. 436], and In re Bacon, 240 Cal.App.2d 34 [49 Cal.Rptr. 322], on the one hand, and In re Debra A., 48…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re BGCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re Ricky H.California Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Leroy T. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. RenteriaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. Greg F.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Charles S. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. Ronnie P.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. ALEX T. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API