Legal Opinion
In Re Brown
California Supreme Court
Decided June 18, 1973No. Docket Nos. Crim. 15580, 15399PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Petitioners, Robert F. Brown and his six codefendants in one criminal prosecution, and Abbass Bozorg and his four codefendants in a second prosecution, were convicted after jury trials of violating Penal Code sections 408 (participating in an unlawful assembly) and 415 (disturbing the peace). They were acquitted of charges of violating section 409 of that code (failure to disperse).
The appellate department of the superior court affirmed the judgments in the two cases and denied certifications to the Court of Appeal. Upon petitions for writs of habeas corpus, we issued orders…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cox v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- People v. ChunCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Collins v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Robin A. Dubner v. City And County Of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.