Legal Opinion
People v. Walter P.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 2009No. C056550PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
The juvenile court found that Walter P., then 17 years old, violated Health and Safety Code section 11357, subdivision (b), which provides as pertinent: “(b) Except as authorized by law, every person who possesses not more than 28.5 grams of marijuana, other than concentrated cannabis, is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars ($100).”
The juvenile court placed Walter on probation for six months. Over Walter’s objection, the court imposed a number of special conditions of probation, including requirements that Walter be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Buckley v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. Erica R.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. J.B.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. D.G.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. R.V.California Court of Appeal · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.