Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2013No. 20120449PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Allen Davenport appeals from a judgment affirming a Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) decision terminating benefits on his claim for treatment of his cervical spine and left shoulder and denying his claims for benefits for treatment of his anxiety and depression and lower back condition. He argues his anxiety and depression and his cervical spine, left shoulder and back conditions are “compensable injuries” under N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(10). We conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could conclude Davenport failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Workforce Safety & Insurance v. AuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bruder v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Aga v. Worforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State by and Through Workforce Safety and Insurance v. SandbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Across Big Sky Flow Testing, LLC v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. WSI v. SalatNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. WSI v. SandbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API