Bergum v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCE
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] William Bergum appeals from a district court judgment affirming a Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”) final order, which dismissed his application for benefits. Because we conclude a reasoning mind reasonably could have found that Bergum failed to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that his January 6, 2006, work incident substantially accelerated the progression of, or substantially worsened the severity of, Bergum’s preexisting condition of chronic low back pain, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] The record reflects that Bergum has had a long history of treatment for back…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Barnes v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Olson v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Geck v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Manske v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Workforce Safety & Insurance v. AuckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Davenport v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Johnson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Mickelson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.