Legal Opinion

Bruder v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 2009No. 20080078PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Workforce Safety and Insurance (“WSI”) appeals from a district court judgment reversing WSI’s final order denying James Bruder’s application for workers compensation benefits for a back injury. We reverse the judgment and reinstate WSI’s final order denying benefits, concluding WSI’s findings of fact were supported by a preponderance of the evidence, WSI adequately explained its reasons for disregarding medical evidence favorable to Bruder, and the district court erred in awarding Bruder costs and attorney fees under N.D.C.C. § 28-32-50(1).

I

[¶ 2] Bruder has had back…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Power Fuels, Inc. v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Olson v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Tverberg v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Manske v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Davenport v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Mickelson v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Workforce Safety & Insurance v. Larry's on Site WeldingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Curran v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Frokjer v. North Dakota Board of Dental ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API