Legal Opinion

James v. Jensen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1917No. 3027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District; Hon. J. D. Gall, Judge. Action by David James against Neis Jensen. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

This is an action in replevin, or claim and delivery, as it is denominated in our statute. The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that on “the 15th day of December, 1915, * * * plaintiff was, and still is, the owner of * * * one red steer, ’ ’ describing the animal and giving marks and brands; that during the month aforesaid “the defendant, without plaintiff’s consent, and wrongfully, took said chattel from the possession of the plaintiff; ’ ’ that the defendant wrongfully “withholds and retains said chattel from the possession of the plaintiff,” etc. The prayer for judgment is in the usual…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Manti City Savings Bank v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jacobs v. EllettUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sanders v. Milford Auto Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State ex rel. Jones v. West Pub. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Petty v. BorgUtah Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API