Legal Opinion

Petty v. Borg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1944No. 6684Published

1Concurrence · LarsonLarson, Justice

I concur in the order affirming the judgment. But I cannot concur in some of the implications of the opinion. I find nothing in the record to indicate any lack of good faith on the part of Borg; nor do I find anything in the record to justify an inference of any fraud practiced or attempted on the part of Borg. He paid in advance his money for the car, to the man from whom, or through whom he was purchasing. When the car was available for delivery, Petty, on the order of Eelsted, knowingly and freely delivered the possession of the car to Borg. Felsted, the seller, as far as Borg was…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Turner.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kunz v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Woodward v. EdmundsUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  3. James v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Dolinsky v. WilliamsUtah Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Watkins v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API