Manti City Savings Bank v. Peterson
Utah Supreme Court
Action by the Manti City Savings Bank against Niels Peterson and. others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. Appeal from District Court, San Pete County; E. Erickson, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtStbaup, J.
1. The respondent, plaintiff below, brought this action against defendants to recover the possession of sheep. Upon findings made by the trial court, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff. The first assignment of errors assails the sufficiency of the complaint. It was alleged in the complaint “that the plaintiff on the 2d day of September, 1903, was entitled to the possession” of the sheep; that on that day a demand for the possession was made by the plaintiff, but the defendants refused to deliver. The complaint was filed September 3, 1903. The defendants’ demurrer to the complaint for…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fredericks v. TracyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Affierbach v. McGovernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Holly v. HeiskellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Kimball v. RedfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Turnbow v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Johnston v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Edgar v. ParsellMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Mahoney v. Citizen's National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Manti City Savings Bank v. PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1908
- Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.