Legal Opinion

Pavek v. Curran

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1988No. File S-2175PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Justice.

In this case we consider the enforceability of a settlement agreement made by the parties in a hearing before the superior court but not yet reduced to writing. The superior court refused to enforce the agreement, and we reverse.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS IN THE SUPERIOR COURT.

In 1982, Ardella Pavek and Hazel Curran started a video rental business in Eagle River, Alaska. Shortly thereafter, they incorporated the business under the name Video to Go, Inc. In March 1986, Pavek and Curran’s business relationship soured, and Pavek filed suit against Curran seeking…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mullins v. OatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Dickerson v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Streb v. StrebAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Rice v. DenleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Barber v. BarberAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API