Legal Opinion

Barber v. Barber

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 14, 1992No. S-4322PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

William Lee Barber, a contingent beneficiary of the Fanni Barber Soine Trust, challenges the superior court’s approval of a settlement agreement which resulted in the termination of the trust over his objection.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Fanni Barber Soine created a family trust to benefit her two sons, Edward G. Barber Sr. and William F. Barber Sr., and their wives and children, on January 2, 1956. A second document, entitled “Clarification of Intent of Creator of Intervivos Trust” was executed in June 1967.

The trust instrument named Edward Sr. as the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Parker v. Northern Mixing Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Interior Credit Bureau, Inc. v. BussingAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Murphy v. MurphyAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Pavek v. CurranAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dodson v. DodsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mullins v. OatesAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Dowling v. StapleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Crane v. CraneAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rice v. DenleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API