Legal Opinion
Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1979No. Civ. 47194PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCOTT, J.
Petitioners, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and James Hurson, sought to compel the performance of an oral settlement agreement made by real party in interest, Sherry Olsen, at a judicial settlement conference. After a full evidentiary hearing as approved in Gregory v. Hamilton (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 213 [142 Cal.Rptr. 563], the petition was denied. We granted Greyhound’s petition for an alternative writ of mandamus to review the trial court’s order.
Real party Olsen filed an action against Greyhound Lines and James Hurson for injuries sustained when a Greyhound bus collided with Hurson’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gregory v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Harris v. Spinali Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Cassin v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
3Cited by14 opinions
- Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nicholson v. BarabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Gorman v. HolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Casa De Valley View Owner's Assn. v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Gopal v. YoshikawaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.