Legal Opinion

Swartzman v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1964No. Civ. 28700PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFleming, J.

Petition for writ of mandate or prohibition to set aside pretrial rulings of the Los Angeles Superior Court. Petitioners are defendants in an eminent domain proceeding brought by the State of California on October 3, 1963. After the cause was at issue, the state advised petitioners in February 1964, that the amount of property taken would be reduced, and in March 1964, the state furnished petitioners with a map and an amended legal description of the property to be taken. On July 15, 1964, the state noticed (1) a motion to amend the complaint to set forth the amended description of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Jacobs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. San Diego Professional Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Kennemur v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Mehl v. People Ex Rel. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ball v. City Council of CoachellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API