Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Wickett

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 2000PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIGRO, Justice.

We granted allowance of appeal in order to consider whether the Superior Court erred in finding that the trial court’s orders sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of demurrers in actions brought pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act1 were not immediately appealable final orders pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 341(b)(2). For the reasons that follow, we reverse.

*599The facts and somewhat convoluted procedural history underlying the instant appeal are as follows: On March 8, 1994, John Pesce, Walter Hollobaugh and Louis Pesce, employees of Pesce Metal Fabricating (PMF),…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Warner v. Continental/CNA Insurance CompaniesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Southwestern Energy Production Co. v. Forest Resources, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Swords v. Harleysville Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Consolidation Coal Co. v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API