Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Insurance Company v. Pinkerton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 20, 2003No. 20 WAP 2002, 28 MAP 2002, 42 MAP 2002, 48 MAP 2002PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice NIGRO.

The question presented in each of these four consolidated actions is whether the Superior Court erred in quashing as untimely an appeal from a declaratory judgment order entered after trial based on the fact that the appellant filed post-trial motions instead of immediately appealing the order. For the following reasons, we hold that the Superior Court did, in fact, err.

In the first of these four consolidated cases, State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Craley, three members of the Craley family were involved in an automobile accident with an uninsured motorist. 784 A.2d…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Chalkey v. RoushSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WickettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MartinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. CraleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Craley v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of BankingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Rice v. Compro Distributing, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Vietri v. Delaware Valley High SchoolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Crystal Lake Camps v. AlfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API