Legal Opinion

Swords v. Harleysville Insurance Companies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2005No. 107 MAP 2004PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

In this appeal, we are asked to determine whether the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (“MVFRL” or the “Law”), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1701 et seq., renders an owner of a registered but uninsured vehicle ineligible to recover first- party benefits when such an owner is injured in an accident which does not involve the owner’s uninsured vehicle. For the reasons that follow, we hold that, under these circumstances, the MVFRL bars the owner from recovering first-party benefits. We, therefore, affirm that portion of the Superior Court’s order reversing the trial court’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fine v. CheccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WickettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Lewis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Windrim v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. JOHNSTON, INC. v. Com., Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Ash v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Phillips v. SeligSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Gallagher, B., Aplt. v. Geico IndemnitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. LevySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Commonwealth v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API