Chalkey v. Roush

OPINION OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

In this appeal, Appellant Mary Chalkey, a/k/a Mary Matula,1 argues that the Superior Court erred in holding that Appellee Franklin Delano Roush, Jr. did not waive his claims on appeal as a result of his failure to file post-trial motions with the trial court. While we find that pursuant to Rule 227.1 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, parties are *464required to file post-trial motions from a trial court’s order following a trial in both actions at law and in equity in order to properly preserve issues that they wish to raise on appeal, we also find…