Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Co. v. Finney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1896No. 16,361PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Allen Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— The appellee, as the administrator of Patrick J. Finney, sued to recover damages growing out of the death of his decedent, through the alleged negligence of the appellant. The complaint, among other things, avers that the appellant is a corporation and operates a railroad running from Pittsburgh to Chicago through Columbia. City and Fort Wayne, Indiana; “that on the 5th day of April, 1890, at and near the defendant’s, station at Columbia. City, the defendant carelessly and negligently maintained a water plug so near its track that a brakeman, standing upon, and climbing up, on the side of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee RailwaySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Oleson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. KemperIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HamlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PerkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railroad v. BundyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. HoltsclawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API