Legal Opinion

Mohebbi v. Khazen

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 23, 2014No. Case No. 13-cv-03044-BLFPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Re: ECF Nos. 34, 48]

ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Saeid Mohebbi (“Plaintiff’ or “Mohebbi”) brings this First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) against Defendants Mahnaz Khazen, Michael Shadman, Violet Parvarandeh, Pirooz Parvarandah, and Stacey Conti (collectively, “Individual Defendants”), as well as U.S. Immigration Investment Center LLC (“USIIC”), USI-IC LLP, and USIIC 1 LP (collectively, “USIIC Defendants”), for twenty-three…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cortina v. Goya Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015
  2. Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC v. NickellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  3. David Rovinsky LLC v. Peter Marco, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
  4. Lifeline Legacy Holdings, LLC v. Ozy MediaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
  5. Murj, Inc. v. Rhythm Management Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API