Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 24, 1995No. C4-94-1629PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Homeowners appeal the district court’s summary judgment against their trespass claim and the denial of them motion to amend them complaint to add claims of invasion of privacy and violation of state and federal wiretapping statutes. We affirm the district court’s denial of the motion to amend the complaint, but we reverse the summary judgment on the trespass claim.
FACTS
In the spring of 1993, KSTP television broadcast an investigative report on the practices of two metro-area veterinarians. One of the veterinarians, Dr. Sam Ulland, treated Greg and Betty Copeland’s cat.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- A. A. Dietemann v. Time, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Miller v. National Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Northern States Power Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Deon L. Thomas v. Bruce Pearl, Individually and in His Representative Capacity as Assistant Basketball Coach of the University of IowaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dennis Simmons D.D.S., P.A. v. Modern Aero, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Medical Laboratory Management Consultants v. American Broadcasting CompaniesDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
- Special Force Ministries v. WCCO TelevisionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Wagner v. WagnerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- First Lutheran Church v. City of St. PaulDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.