Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Wagner
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 16, 1999No. 98-1704 (DWF/AJB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
FRANK, District Judge.
Introduction
This action arises under the federal wiretapping statute, Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Title III”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, and its Minnesota counterpart, Minn.Stat. § 626A.01, et seq. Two lawsuits were commenced and have been consolidated into the present proceeding. Plaintiff Lesa Wagner sued her former husband, Defendant Robert Wagner, for civil damages, alleging that Robert Wagner taped telephone conversations between Lesa Wagner and their two minor children. Plaintiff Sandra Wagner, the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Enterprise Bank v. Magna Bank of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Samuel B. Pollock Jr. And Laura Pollock v. Sandra T. Pollock, Oliver H. Barber, and Luann C. GlidewellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WhitnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- Glenn A. Griffin v. Cristie J. GriffinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
- Commonwealth v. BarbozaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. F.W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.