Legal Opinion

Stagg v. Stagg

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1931No. 6,782PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Mary Elizabeth Stagg, deceased, expressly waiving the tort, brought this action upon an implied contract to recover the value of certain described articles of jewelry alleged to have been owned by the deceased during her lifetime, and which were converted by the defendant. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, the court sustained the motion of defendant for a nonsuit, and judgment for costs was entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and he has appealed from the judgment.

The complaint is in the usual form,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Leyson v. DavisMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. City of Butte v. GoodwinMontana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Harrington v. Stromberg-Mullins Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Schaeffer v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Podhajsky v. BednarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ERMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Cechovic v. Hardin & Associates, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Raymond W. George TrustMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Brown's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Quitmeyer v. TherouxMontana Supreme Court · 1964

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API