Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Stromberg-Mullins Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1903No. 1, 973PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from District Gourt, Silver Bow County j William Clancy, Judge. AotioN by Cor. O. HarringtoR against tbe Stromberg-Mul-Hrs Company, a corporation. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defeRdaRt appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ho'Lloway

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

This is au actiou in conversion. Tbe complaiut alleges tbat tbe defeudaut is a corporation; tbat or August 1,1901, Timothy P. Harrington executed aud delivered to tbe plaintiff aud re-spoudeut, Cor. O. HarriugtoR, bis promissory Rote for $500, due oue year after date,- witb interest at 6 per cent, per annum, aud to secure tbe payment thereof executed a chattel mortgage upou certain personal property; tbat or August 16, 1901, tbe said Timothy P. HarriugtoR executed aud delivered to plaiutiff bis certain other promissory note for tbe. sum of $500, due oue year…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. PowerMontana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Binnian v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Reardon v. PattersonMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rocheleau v. BoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Raymond v. BlancgrassMontana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Stagg v. StaggMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Interstate National Bank v. McCormickMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Moore v. CrittendenMontana Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API