Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ER
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from judgments entered in the District Court of Yellowstone County on a directed verdict in favor of defendant Squibb & Sons, a partial directed verdict in favor of defendant Frederic S. Marks, and a jury verdict rendered in favor of Dr. Marks on the remaining claims against him.
Plaintiff Victor F. Hill suffers from severe allergic reactions (contact dermatitis) to a variety of substances and most severely to petroleum based products. Hill was a mechanic by trade, and thus was subject to constant exposure to those products. He was first *202treated by defendant Dr.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Montana Deaconess Hospital v. GrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Newville v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
- Northern Trust Co. v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.