Legal Opinion

Hill v. Squibb & Sons, ER

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1979No. 14407PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Haswell

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from judgments entered in the District Court of Yellowstone County on a directed verdict in favor of defendant Squibb & Sons, a partial directed verdict in favor of defendant Frederic S. Marks, and a jury verdict rendered in favor of Dr. Marks on the remaining claims against him.

Plaintiff Victor F. Hill suffers from severe allergic reactions (contact dermatitis) to a variety of substances and most severely to petroleum based products. Hill was a mechanic by trade, and thus was subject to constant exposure to those products. He was first *202treated by defendant Dr.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Terhune v. A. H. Robins Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Montana Deaconess Hospital v. GrattonMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Kerrigan v. O'MearaMontana Supreme Court · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Gourdine v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  2. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Newville v. State, Dept. of Family ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Northern Trust Co. v. Upjohn Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API