Legal Opinion

Cechovic v. Hardin & Associates, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1995No. 94-028PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

The plaintiffs, Bernard and June Cechovic, filed a complaint, and later an amended complaint, in the District Court for the Sixth Judicial District in Park County in which Dixie Bullock, Edward Hardin, Pamela Saville (n/k/a Pamela Springall), and Hardin and Associates were named as defendants. The Cechovics alleged that they sustained damages as a result of Bullock’s negligent misrepresentation regarding the boundary for property they purchased from Saville. Saville filed a cross-claim against Hardin and Bullock in which she sought indemnification for any damages she might be obligated to…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. DesayeMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Kitchen Krafters, Inc. v. Eastside BankMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re the Marriage of BarnardMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Hunsaker v. Bozeman Deaconess FoundationMontana Supreme Court · 1978

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Foremost Ins. Co. v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Busta Ex Rel. Busta v. Columbus Hospital Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Werre v. DavidMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Jarvenpaa v. Glacier Electric Cooperative, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API