United States v. Gila Valley Irrigation District
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
In these consolidated appeals involving the Globe Equity Decree of 1935, we must decide whether landowners can transfer their rights to divert water from the Gila River which flows through southern Arizona.
I
A
These cases arise out of litigation that began over ninety years ago. In 1925, the United States first brought suit on behalf of the Gila River Indian Community (“Community”) and the San Carlos Apache Tribe (“Tribe”), seeking to adjudicate the water rights involving the Gila River. In 1935, the district court entered a consent decree, known as the Globe…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Smith v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Earth Island Inst. v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- United States v. Ellen SwensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. US Board of Water Comm'rCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.