Boggavarapu v. Ponist
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
Appellants, Richard and Carol Ponist, appeal from an order of the Superior Court, 368 Pa.Super. 634, 531 A.2d 28, affirming an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County granting the motion for new trial of appellees, Rao and Vani Boggavarapu.
Two puncture wounds were inflicted on the right arm of Mr. Boggavarapu, when he was bitten by his neighbor’s dog. He went to the emergency room of the East Suburban Health Center where the wounds were covered by a bandaid and two tetanus shots were administered. Mr. Boggavarapu filed suit for pain and suffering and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Lasprogata v. QuallsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Bellettiere v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Spangler v. Helm's New York-Pittsburgh Motor ExpressSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Henery v. ShadleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.