Legal Opinion

Carrozza v. Greenbaum

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 8, 2004PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J.:

¶ 1 In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in denying motions for post-trial relief in the form of a judgment non obstante verdicto or, in the alternative, a new trial and remittitur. Specifically, we must decide whether Appellee, Lynda Carrozza, presented sufficient expert testimony to prove negligence and causation in a medical malpractice action. In addition, we are asked to consider whether the trial court properly resolved satisfaction of the ultimate judgment. Specifically, we must determine whether a finding of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Winschel v. JainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Freed v. Geisinger Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API