Carrozza v. Greenbaum
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY McCAFFERY, J.:
¶ 1 In this consolidated appeal, we are asked to determine whether the trial court erred in denying motions for post-trial relief in the form of a judgment non obstante verdicto or, in the alternative, a new trial and remittitur. Specifically, we must decide whether Appellee, Lynda Carrozza, presented sufficient expert testimony to prove negligence and causation in a medical malpractice action. In addition, we are asked to consider whether the trial court properly resolved satisfaction of the ultimate judgment. Specifically, we must determine whether a finding of…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MelvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Cooper v. Frankford Health Care System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Winschel v. JainSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Carrozza v. GreenbaumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Freed v. Geisinger Medical CenterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.