Legal Opinion

Spangler v. Helm's New York-Pittsburgh Motor Express

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1959No. Appeal, No. 189PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Musmanno,

Mrs. Eegina E. Spangler, 36 years of age, was hilled in an automobile accident, caused by the negligence of the driver of a tractor-trailer owned by Helm’s New York-Pittsburgh Motor Express, the defendant in this case. Clyde G. Spangler, husband of the decedent and now administrator of her estate, brought actions against the defendant under the Wrongful Death and Survival Acts. The jury returned a verdict in his favor in the sum of $679.54 in the Wrongful Death Act action and $45,380 under the Survival Act, for a total of $46,059.54.

The Trial Judge declared the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  3. Glaister v. Eazor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Hutchison v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Schmitt v. Jenkins Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Scaife Co. v. Rockwell-Standard Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers HospitalTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API