Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bailey v. . McLain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1939Published

1DissentClarkson, J.

The majority opinion in the instant case permits a part of the heirs of a testator, as caveators, through a secret agreement with propounder and for a cash consideration, to withhold *159evidence of tbe invalidity of a will and tbns insure its probate. From sucb a view of our law, I respectfully dissent.

Tbe plaintiffs bere elected not to enter into, and actively contest, tbe probate of tbe will. Yet, if tbe will bad not been probated, tbey would bave received a third of tbe proceeds of a $35,000 secured note. As tbey were cited to appear in tbe proceedings, tbey were bound by tbe judgment entered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Estate of StaabWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hutson v. . SawyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Bailey v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1835
  4. Syme v. . BroughtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Taylor v. HoytWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API