Legal Opinion

Burchett v. Mason

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1951No. 162PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The present proceeding can be sustained only upon the holding that the will of Spottswood Mason is void for vagueness and uncertainty in the description of the different properties therein attempted to be devised. Hodges v. Stewart, 218 N.C. 290, 10 S.E. 2d 723, and eases cited. Of course, a nullity may be upset by direct or collateral attack, ignored, disregarded, or treated as ineffectual, anywhere at any time. Ex mhilo nihil fit is one maxim that admits of no exceptions. Harrell v. Welstead, 206 N.C. 817, 175 S.E. 283.

The paper writing in question was probated in common form as the will of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Harrell v. . WelsteadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Brissie v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Southern Distributing Co. v. CarrawaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Hodges v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Rand v. . GilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kayann Properties, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Fuller v. HedgpethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API