Legal Opinion
Yoder v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided June 4, 1997No. 3:96 CV 7239PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment will be denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
I. Background
Plaintiff Lavern Yoder brings this action against his employer to recover for damages he alleged were caused as a result of Defendant’s failure to keep his medical records confidential. The dispositive facts are not in dispute. Defendant Ingersoll-Rand Company is a Delaware Corporation doing business in the state of Ohio as the Aro…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lee v. City of Columbus, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Blanco v. Bath Iron Works Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 2011
- Rohan v. Networks Presentation, LLC.District Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Pachowitz v. LeDouxCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Wiggins v. DaVita Tidewater, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.