United States v. Weakley
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Defendants Jeffrey Weakley (‘Weakley”), Richard Flowers (“Flowers”), and Dorothy Flowers (“D.Flowers”) (collectively, “Defendants”) were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Defendants were initially sentenced in 2003, but we vacated the sentences and remanded for resentencing. See United States v. Anderson, 94 Fed.Appx. 487 (9th Cir. 2004). Upon re-sentencing, the district court refused to make a factual determination as to tax loss and sentenced all three Defendants outside the advisory Sentencing Guidelines ranges, imposing…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.