Legal Opinion
United States v. William George Howard
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 1990No. 89-30093PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge:
William Howard appeals the district court’s decision not to reduce Howard’s base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”). Howard argues that he was entitled to have his offense level reduced by two points because he was only a minor participant in the conspiracy to which he had pled guilty. Howard states that the district court improperly interpreted the Guidelines, improperly assessed the facts that showed the extent to which Howard had participated in the conspiracy, and failed to provide any reason for imposing the particular length of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Leonard Orozco BuenrostroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Steven W. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. John W. McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Gilberto Ocasio, A/K/A Gilberto Ocasio AgostoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Steven Douglas DareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.