United States v. Ronald Jordan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RONALD M. GOULD; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Ronald Jordan (“Jordan”) pled guilty to one count of bank robbery in *924violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a). The district court increased Jordan’s offense level by five for possession of a firearm during the robbery and by an additional four for abducting a witness during his escape. On appeal, Jordan contends that the disproportionate impact of these sentencing enhancements required the district court, in determining facts relating to such enhancements, to apply a standard of proof of “clear…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Steven Douglas DareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.