Legal Opinion

United States v. Ronald Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 5, 2001No. 97-10255PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge RONALD M. GOULD; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Ronald Jordan (“Jordan”) pled guilty to one count of bank robbery in *924violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2114(a). The district court increased Jordan’s offense level by five for possession of a firearm during the robbery and by an additional four for abducting a witness during his escape. On appeal, Jordan contends that the disproportionate impact of these sentencing enhancements required the district court, in determining facts relating to such enhancements, to apply a standard of proof of “clear…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. United States v. Gonzalez-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Matthew Eugene DupasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Steven Douglas DareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API