Legal Opinion
In Re Fisher
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 8, 2011No. 11-10452PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
The petitioners James R. Fisher and Odyssey Residential Holdings, LP (hereinafter, collectively, “Fisher”) move for reconsideration of our prior decision denying Fisher’s petition for a writ of mandamus. Having reviewed the newly available sentencing transcript, we remain persuaded that the district court did not clearly and indisputably err by finding that Fisher failed to prove that he was directly and proximately harmed as a result of Ronald Slovacek’s commission of the offense of conspiracy to bribe agents of a local government receiving federal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. James Scott Mann William M. Moore, Defendants-Appellants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Antonio DonabyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Victor HackettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Renard L. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BurkholderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Ronald SlovacekCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
- United States v. Giraldo-SernaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. BurkholderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.