Legal Opinion
United States v. Victor Hackett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 26, 2002No. 01-30360PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge.
DefendanL-Appellant Victor Hackett appeals the district court’s order of restitution for property damage caused by a fire that resulted from the operation of a methamphetamine laboratory. He argues that the district court erred (1) by applying 21 U.S.C. § 853(q)(3) to order restitution for property damage, and (2) by finding that he directly and proximately caused the loss. We affirm.
Background
Victor Hackett pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting the manufacture of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Hackett’s co-defendant Shandy…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. James Cabaccang, United States of America v. Richard T. Cabaccang, United States of America v. Roy Toves CabaccangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Angelica LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jacob De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.