Legal Opinion

Smith v. Safeguard Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 20, 1968No. Appeal, 769PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The appellee claimed damages under the uninsured motorist provision of an insurance policy issued by the appellant. As the parties were unable to agree on the amount of damages, the dispute was submitted to arbitration pursuant to the following standard provision in the policy:

“8. Arbitration: If any person making claim hereunder and the company do not agree that such person is legally entitled to recover damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile because of bodily injury to the insured, or do not agree as to the amount of payment which may be owing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Romberger v. RombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. JA Robbins Co., Inc. v. Airportels, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Whitney v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  4. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Meyers & Joly v. FreilingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. SWARB Et Al. v. LENNOX Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Gonzales v. Procaccio Bros. Trucking Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Troutman v. Court of Common Pleas of Berks CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Raitport v. Provident National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API