Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 26, 1890No. 142PublishedCited by 35 opinions

APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY. No. 142 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 244 August Term 1889, C. P. On June 1, 1889, a judgment in favor of F. M. Whitney against James Hopkins, for $4,765.65, with interest from June 1,1889, was entered by the prothonotary, upon Hie filing of articles of agreement, under seal, between F. M. Whitney and James Hopkins, dated April 9, 1884, wherein Whitney covenanted to sell and convey to…

Read the full summary

APPEAL BY DEFENDANT FROM THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF SUSQUEHANNA COUNTY. No. 142 January Term 1890, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 244 August Term 1889, C. P. On June 1, 1889, a judgment in favor of F. M. Whitney against James Hopkins, for $4,765.65, with interest from June 1,1889, was entered by the prothonotary, upon Hie filing of articles of agreement, under seal, between F. M. Whitney and James Hopkins, dated April 9, 1884, wherein Whitney covenanted to sell and convey to Hopkins a tract of land in Jackson township, provided that Hopkins performed his covenants therein at the time mentioned,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion,

Mr. Justice Williams:

The learned counsel for the appellant is right in the general proposition on which he rests his appeal. The prothonotary of the Court of Common Pleas is merely the clerk of the court. He has no authority, virtute officii, to act as the clerk, agent, or attorney of any person. It is his duty to record upoh the minutes of the court all judgments rendered by or confessed before the court whose clerk lie is. Tf he is not personally present, the court may direct any competent bystander to make the entries upon the record; for the legal effect of such entries does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connay v. HalsteadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Elmer J. Jonnet v. Dollar Savings Bank of the City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  2. Smith v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Pacific Lumber Co. v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. ROSE v. CohenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Dalton v. WillingmyreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API