Legal Opinion
Raitport v. Provident National Bank
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 12, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-3572PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
• Eli Raitport filed the complaint in this action pro se, seeking both damages and injunctive relief under the 1871 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (1970), and under sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2 (1976). The defendants— Provident National Bank and its counsel, various state and local government officials, several private individuals, and a local real estate firm — -are linked by reason of their involvement in the events leading up to a sheriff’s sale on December 6, 1976, at which a house owned by Raitport was sold to the high…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- George Corey, Trust Fund v. New York Stock ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Alfonse Reichenberger v. Rev. Richard PritchardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Wasyl, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. First Boston Corp., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- New England Cleaning Services, Inc. v. American Arbitration Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.