Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Doughty

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1963PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Carl Johnson and Bessie Johnson each recovered a default judgment against one Lawrence Doughty for damages arising out of an automobile collision. Thereafter, the Johnsons brought writs of garnishment against Farmers Insurance Exchange. That garnishee now appeals from judgments entered in favor of each plaintiff. The cases have been consolidated for this appeal.

The collision occurred while Doughty was driving an automobile he had borrowed from one Smith. The garnishee at all material times was the carrier of insurance for Smith’s automobile. Smith and Doughty resided at the same address in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Allegretto v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wallin v. KnudtsonWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wallace v. Universal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lusch v. Aetna Casualty & Surety CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API