Wallace v. Universal Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtBotein, P. J.
Prior to the commencement of this action tiffs had recovered a judgment against one Frank Floyd in a personal injury action. The injuries resulted from the operation of an automobile owned by Floyd, to whom defendant insurance carrier had issued a -policy of insurance. In the present action plaintiffs seek to charge defendant with the amount of the judgment, pursuant to section 167 of the Insurance Law. Defendant’s contention, based on the construction of the predecessor statute to section 167 in Coleman v. New Amsterdam Cas. Co. (247 N. Y. *122271), is that Floyd had breached the condition…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Rushing v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Imperiali v. PicaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Finkle v. Western Automobile InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Pennsylvania Threshermen and Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Emily S. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Carpenter v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. TillmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
- Johnson v. DoughtyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Tibbs v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.