Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1964PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*287DENECKE, J.

The question for decision is whether or not the defendant insurer used due diligence to secure the cooperation of its insured to assist in the defense of an action for damages.

The defendant, hereinafter referred to as Farmers, wrote an automobile liability policy for one Ratzlaff. During the policy period Ratzlaff had a collision with one of the plaintiffs, Sjolund. Sjolund carried collision insurance with the plaintiff insurance company, hereinafter called State Farm. After State Farm paid Sjolund for the damages to his automobile, less the deductible, Sjolund and State Farm…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Portland Flour Mills Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In Re Vilas' EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Johnson v. DoughtyOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Matlock v. BabbOregon Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sabin v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. SevierOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bailey v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Carpenter v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Colson v. Lloyd's of LondonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. State v. Aguirre-RodriguezOregon Supreme Court · 2021

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API